Insights / articlesInsights
Insights / articles

Published Article

The Earned Wage Access Boom: Sixteen States Propose Legislation to Regulate These Types of Products

Read Time: 2 mins

Since the beginning of 2025, sixteen states have proposed legislation to regulate earned wage access. These states would join Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, South Carolina, and Wisconsin, which have each enacted legislation to regulate advances of funds so employees can access their funds before payday.

Generally, these bills aim to regulate providers of direct-to-consumer or employer-integrated wage access service. Earned wage access is generally defined as advances that are based on a consumer’s earned but unpaid wages. The proposed bills exacerbate the current lack of consistency in the earned wage space, as some states consider the product a “loan” while other states expressly exclude the product from their state’s definition of “loan.” In addition to proposing substantive requirements, these products vary in treatment of common fees such as voluntary tipping and expedited transfer fees. States have also proposed licensing or registration regimes for providers of earned wage access.

The following states have introduced earned wage access legislation:

  1. Arizona SB 1582
  2. Colorado HB 1020
  3. Connecticut HB 5007
  4. Indiana HB 1125
  5. Maryland HB 1294
  6. Mississippi HB 1307 / SB 2496
  7. Missouri HB 576 / SB 293 / HB 1113
  8. New Mexico HB 59
  9. New York AB 258 / AB 682
  10. North Dakota HB 1393
  11. Oklahoma HB 2086 / SB 781
  12. Oregon HB 2131 / SB 481
  13. Texas SB 938 / HB 2043
  14. Utah HB 279
  15. Vermont HB 99
  16. Washington HB 1063

It is fair to say that the boom of legislation in the earned wage access space arose as the result of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Proposed Interpretive Rule from July 2024 that categorizes earned wage access products as “credit” subject to the substantive obligations under the federal Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z. The continued lack of consistency from state to state, and potentially between state and federal obligations, creates tension with compliance obligations including but not limited to finance charge treatment and required disclosures.

We will continue to monitor for updates and enactment.

Reprinted with permission from the American Bar Association’s Business Law Today February 2025 Month-In-Brief: Business & Regulated Industries.

Insights

Presentation

Regulatory Focus on Default Management

March 17, 2025

Member Mark Edelman (Cleveland) will co-present "Regulatory Focus on Default Management" at Consumer Bankers Association (CBA) Live 2025 on March 17, 2025, in Orlando, Florida.

Alert

FinCEN Announces No Penalties for BOI Reporting Failures

February 28, 2025

On February 27, 2025, FinCEN announced “it will not issue any fines or penalties or take any other enforcement actions against companies based on any failure to file or update beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act by the current deadlines . . . until a forthcoming interim final rule becomes effective and new relevant due dates in the interim final rule have passed.”

Alert

Credit, Tips, Obligation to Pay: CFPB Proposed Interpretive Rule Seeks to Clarify Earned Wage Access and Regulation Z

August 26, 2024

On July 18, 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued notice of a proposed interpretive rule (Rule) that walks back a prior 2020 Advisory Opinion on the manner in which Regulation Z defines “credit.” The Rule also declares certain types of optional consumer payments to be “incident to or a condition of the extension of credit” such that the fee is a finance charge for purposes of Regulation Z.