Represented a national bank in which a borrower filed counterclaims against the bank alleging that it fabricated her signature on a promissory note. After extensive discovery, we moved for summary judgment, and the court ultimately granted the bank’s motion, finding that the borrower’s purported handwriting expert did not qualify as one and that the signatureMore

The plaintiff claimed that our client, a national bank, had breached the terms of a conditional loan commitment to finance the purchase and renovation of a building for a Subway restaurant by withdrawing the commitment after the plaintiff spent tens of thousands of dollars repairing the property. The case ultimately proceeded to a jury trialMore

After garnishment proceedings had been initiated against our client, a national trust company, we were able to stop the collection efforts and get a default judgment that was more than five years old vacated against the client so that the case could be litigated on its merits. 

Our client, an indirect automobile finance company, had moved to compel arbitration of a lawsuit filed against it. When the motion was denied, we appealed and were successful in not only getting the judgment reversed but also getting the appellate court to declare that the client’s arbitration clause was not substantively and procedurally unconscionable.

Represented a national bank in federal court against claims that it and its foreclosure counsel had engaged in racketeering activity in violation of RICO when it purportedly fabricated its standing to foreclose. After extensive discovery and multiple lawsuits, we were able to get judgment in favor of our client, finding, among other things, that it didMore

Represented both the LLC and its owner-members in a shareholder derivative suit challenging various changes to the corporate structure and make-up of the board of directors, ultimately resolving the case after extensive discovery and mediation practice.

Borrowers asserted numerous counterclaims and defenses in a contested foreclosure claiming that client failed to comply with HUD/FHA regulations prior to foreclosure and as a result, was stopped from foreclosing. After significant discovery, we moved for summary judgment, arguing that non-compliance with HUD/FHA regulations can only form a defense, not an affirmative cause of action,More

Representing a national mortgage servicing company, was successful in getting a judgment finding that the client’s foreclosure claim was time-barred reversed on appeal. 

The plaintiff contended that the auto finance company charged the dealership a “fee” as a condition of financing the vehicle purchase. This purported “fee” in turn was allegedly charged to the consumer through raising the price of the vehicle from its advertised price. The plaintiff contended that this “fee” was actually a hidden finance charge required toMore

McGlinchey’s Commercial Law Bulletin is a biweekly update of recent, unique, and impactful cases in state and federal courts in the area of commercial litigation.

In a unanimous Opinion issued Monday, May 23, the United States Supreme Court resolved a circuit split and held that waiver of a right to arbitrate does not require a showing of prejudice to the opposing party.

McGlinchey’s Commercial Law Bulletin is a biweekly update of recent, unique, and impactful cases in state and federal courts in the area of commercial litigation.

On April 15, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued its annual report on the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The report not only looks back at the number and type of debt collection complaints the bureau received in 2021, but also identifies specific debt collection activities that the bureau targeted in the past year.

McGlinchey’s Commercial Law Bulletin is a biweekly update of recent, unique, and impactful cases in state and federal courts in the area of commercial litigation.