Represented a national bank in which a borrower filed counterclaims against the bank alleging that it fabricated her signature on a promissory note. After extensive discovery, we moved for summary judgment, and the court ultimately granted the bank’s motion, finding that the borrower’s purported handwriting expert did not qualify as one and that the signatureMore

The plaintiff claimed that our client, a national bank, had breached the terms of a conditional loan commitment to finance the purchase and renovation of a building for a Subway restaurant by withdrawing the commitment after the plaintiff spent tens of thousands of dollars repairing the property. The case ultimately proceeded to a jury trialMore

After garnishment proceedings had been initiated against our client, a national trust company, we were able to stop the collection efforts and get a default judgment that was more than five years old vacated against the client so that the case could be litigated on its merits. 

Our client, an indirect automobile finance company, had moved to compel arbitration of a lawsuit filed against it. When the motion was denied, we appealed and were successful in not only getting the judgment reversed but also getting the appellate court to declare that the client’s arbitration clause was not substantively and procedurally unconscionable.

Represented a national bank in federal court against claims that it and its foreclosure counsel had engaged in racketeering activity in violation of RICO when it purportedly fabricated its standing to foreclose. After extensive discovery and multiple lawsuits, we were able to get judgment in favor of our client, finding, among other things, that it didMore

Represented both the LLC and its owner-members in a shareholder derivative suit challenging various changes to the corporate structure and make-up of the board of directors, ultimately resolving the case after extensive discovery and mediation practice.

Borrowers asserted numerous counterclaims and defenses in a contested foreclosure claiming that client failed to comply with HUD/FHA regulations prior to foreclosure and as a result, was stopped from foreclosing. After significant discovery, we moved for summary judgment, arguing that non-compliance with HUD/FHA regulations can only form a defense, not an affirmative cause of action,More

Representing a national mortgage servicing company, was successful in getting a judgment finding that the client’s foreclosure claim was time-barred reversed on appeal. 

Loss Mitigation Review Under RESPA Hurst v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc., N.D.Ohio No. 5:19-cv-00315, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51849 (Mar. 19, 2021) In this matter, the Northern District of Ohio held that a loan servicer did not violate RESPA as it did not repeatedly request documents already in its possession, but rather requested documents thatMore

Contract Interpretation McCruter v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co., 11th Dist. Lake No. 2019-L-167, 2021-Ohio-472 In this appeal, the Eleventh Appellate District affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court’s decision, and remanded the matter after determining the trial court’s interpretation of the contract was contrary to the express language of theMore

Specific Performance Jad Rentals of Youngstown, LLC v. Cox, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 19 MA 0096, 2021-Ohio-304 In this appeal, the Seventh Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s decision, agreeing that the buyer was entitled to an award of specific performance to purchase the seller’s property. The Bullet Point: Real estate is almost always consideredMore

Unconscionability Defense to Arbitration Sebold v. Latina Design Build Group, L.L.C., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109362, 2021-Ohio-124 In this appeal, the Eighth Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s decision agreeing that the arbitration provision was not procedurally unconscionable. The Bullet Point: Ohio has a strong public policy favoring arbitration of disputes. As such, Ohio courtsMore

Statute of Repose Wilson v. Durrani, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-6827 In this appeal, the Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the lower court’s decision, determining that the plaintiffs’ claims were time-barred because Ohio’s saving statute does not create an exception to a true statute of repose. The Bullet Point: Statutes of limitations establish a time limitMore